Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-17 15:20:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A80AE9CC6AE744E0A399E43267E7084B9D3F8BDC6D6EED5E5063C948E34A3C74
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. Forbes has used the data available at a given time. It would not be fair to change the rules for a single person by including donations published later, as this could also apply to others. 2. comparing absolute numbers misses the point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1673019005479661574
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A80AE9CC6AE744E0A399E43267E7084B9D3F8BDC6D6EED5E5063C948E34A3C74
  • createdAtMillis - 1710688816953
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1673019005479661574A80AE9CC6AE744E0A399E43267E7084B9D3F8BDC6D6EED5E5063C948E34A3C74