Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-17 11:58:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 670D5BFC492F5BB296A7EFED4361AB4335E1CAE2886BAA7BD6D985437CB2A5D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no proof ROGD exists, both papers proposing it have been retracted. No other researchers have found any evidence that it exists (eg https://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476(21)01085-4/fulltext ) Also autogynephilia as diagnosis that is not recognised by most of the medical establishment https://www.juliaserano.com/av/SeranoVeale22-autogynephilia-FEFs.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669752728032096263
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 670D5BFC492F5BB296A7EFED4361AB4335E1CAE2886BAA7BD6D985437CB2A5D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1687003119969
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1669752728032096263670D5BFC492F5BB296A7EFED4361AB4335E1CAE2886BAA7BD6D985437CB2A5D0