Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-15 14:26:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7520B94C6E325ADC1D45A3E0CB14B7361DE62DC1A28172C4423210D30082F54B
Participant Details

Original Note:

La conclusión del paper citado señala que el ensayo fue incapaz de proveer evidencia concluyente: "This trial was unable to provide conclusive evidence on facemask efficacy against viral respiratory infections most likely due to poor adherence to protocol." https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240287

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669135982405328896
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7520B94C6E325ADC1D45A3E0CB14B7361DE62DC1A28172C4423210D30082F54B
  • createdAtMillis - 1686839203517
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16691359824053288967520B94C6E325ADC1D45A3E0CB14B7361DE62DC1A28172C4423210D30082F54B