Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-12 05:29:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D141E4865E26624461C66D8208571CB9E95B76EE88939251C5E42576E1A9C30
Participant Details

Original Note:

Blatant misrepresentation of this article and the proposed law, which only pertains to insurance. It doesn’t require surrogacy from anyone. It states that insurance must cover all couples pursuing surrogacy, not just infertile straight couples. Source : the same article

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1667917525970046976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1D141E4865E26624461C66D8208571CB9E95B76EE88939251C5E42576E1A9C30
  • createdAtMillis - 1686547761226
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16679175259700469761D141E4865E26624461C66D8208571CB9E95B76EE88939251C5E42576E1A9C30