Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-07 12:38:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 822E5C7DF6348EA32EB5CBBFF7918006DA0D37101003FDCD3AEA0C4B7A2CE4F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article includes a link to the court filing including the names of the twitter lawyers serving as the basis for this article. NNN https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.387133/gov.uscourts.cand.387133.195.0.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1666292708745330690
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 822E5C7DF6348EA32EB5CBBFF7918006DA0D37101003FDCD3AEA0C4B7A2CE4F3
  • createdAtMillis - 1686141490358
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1666292708745330690822E5C7DF6348EA32EB5CBBFF7918006DA0D37101003FDCD3AEA0C4B7A2CE4F3