Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-06 23:45:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 15661FFC607545C493B25361B089E3FA7111C80D2F961F378893AD3A36267BA4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, Tweet doesn’t address legitimacy of buy backs or constitutionality of the ownership of firearms under the 2nd amendment. Tweet instead claims of protesting, which is anecdotal, and the rest of the tweet only states opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1666122794311225344
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 15661FFC607545C493B25361B089E3FA7111C80D2F961F378893AD3A36267BA4
  • createdAtMillis - 1686095114914
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166612279431122534415661FFC607545C493B25361B089E3FA7111C80D2F961F378893AD3A36267BA4