Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-05-27 12:36:52 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B881091D7D0B2FCFA9846A3CD7915AC776554442B93B6FA2EE50364E36658A23
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court agreed unanimously that CWA did not apply to Sackett property, but split 5-4 on the opinion. The majority opinion reversed five decades of EPA rule making and limited the scope of the CWA's authority to regulate waters of the US, which 4 judges disapproved of. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency_(2023) https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-454_4g15.pdf
All Note Details