Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-26 17:02:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFFC550093B0CFB176FB54C1BE4E817C9D8C96C054A2C57963A190E251E5FD62
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet expresses an opinion so no additional notes are needed. Keep discussions in the comments and avoid abusing community notes. As an addendum, there are doctors in the comments questioning the validity of the studies in the note above.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661542505899327491
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFFC550093B0CFB176FB54C1BE4E817C9D8C96C054A2C57963A190E251E5FD62
  • createdAtMillis - 1685120569380
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1661542505899327491EFFC550093B0CFB176FB54C1BE4E817C9D8C96C054A2C57963A190E251E5FD62