Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-25 23:20:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 293293476437B814B9D00D959B83228667D0B82A26CFD985DFF035B41604DF97
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Even with its loose use of "objectively," this tweet is still a personal opinion, and counterarguments to its easy to contest stance, which many of these notes do a good job doing, should be kept in the comment section.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1660381125556989954
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 293293476437B814B9D00D959B83228667D0B82A26CFD985DFF035B41604DF97
  • createdAtMillis - 1685056837084
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1660381125556989954293293476437B814B9D00D959B83228667D0B82A26CFD985DFF035B41604DF97