Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-21 00:08:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF37E84E90611D2C09E0C4783A129C16AF3F47946953BBDC410C1EBA376C23D5
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP stating his opinion. Arguments against his statement belong in replies. Twitter allows for the engagement of differing opinions. Not every such Tweet needs a CN. CN loses effectiveness when used subjectively to nitpick opinions rather than argued via replies/quote tweets. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659991057415786496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF37E84E90611D2C09E0C4783A129C16AF3F47946953BBDC410C1EBA376C23D5
  • createdAtMillis - 1684627684115
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1659991057415786496EF37E84E90611D2C09E0C4783A129C16AF3F47946953BBDC410C1EBA376C23D5