Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-18 23:50:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 697FBADFC0B8BFAD77701DCFB6F9545E5D1FDC70AD02D2CC4AC2C5781CE1F491
Participant Details

Original Note:

The suggested notes go off on a tangent, and are not relevant to the tweet. They are simply someone's opinion on a controversial surgery, which is more suited for a reply, not a note. Additionally, the sources provided are largely biased, which lowers their credibility.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659319913440215040
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 697FBADFC0B8BFAD77701DCFB6F9545E5D1FDC70AD02D2CC4AC2C5781CE1F491
  • createdAtMillis - 1684453851682
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1659319913440215040697FBADFC0B8BFAD77701DCFB6F9545E5D1FDC70AD02D2CC4AC2C5781CE1F491