Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-15 00:05:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6ABCC2CECF4D42C8DE8DB879B7BA112D5FD0E2E70B031BAA73B9C14C8B551816
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's worth noting that while the case did indeed go in Wikipedia's favor, the site was banned in Turkey from 2017 until the 2019 ruling. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-wikipedia/turkeys-block-on-wikipedia-violates-rights-court-rules-idUSKBN1YU0S3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657546305391017985
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6ABCC2CECF4D42C8DE8DB879B7BA112D5FD0E2E70B031BAA73B9C14C8B551816
  • createdAtMillis - 1684109142244
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16575463053910179856ABCC2CECF4D42C8DE8DB879B7BA112D5FD0E2E70B031BAA73B9C14C8B551816