Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-13 05:11:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6088625302813EAE3A89ACE12BA2392E1E4CE3CBE28226AB7BF320D8BEA9C7DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is based on "a new study published as a preprint paper, yet to be peer-reviewed, on the bioRxiv server" as the article linked in the main tweet says. Removing this critical information from the headline alters the perceived validity of the findings https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.04.21.537778v1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657229926137991168
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6088625302813EAE3A89ACE12BA2392E1E4CE3CBE28226AB7BF320D8BEA9C7DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1683954672873
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16572299261379911686088625302813EAE3A89ACE12BA2392E1E4CE3CBE28226AB7BF320D8BEA9C7DD