Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 08:51:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5EAEC304C41E684B450BAB437CAE46D6B9471534191AE6F0AB639A7491CC111D
Participant Details

Original Note:

O twitter em debate não versa sobre liberdade conforme a CF/ 88 assegura, o dado post faz aceno a censura 🤬, uma vez que almeja tolir e punir uma empresa de mídia digital que possui direito de se expressar como qq cidadão, ela tem personalidade jurídica.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1656111431547518977
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5EAEC304C41E684B450BAB437CAE46D6B9471534191AE6F0AB639A7491CC111D
  • createdAtMillis - 1683708712591
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16561114315475189775EAEC304C41E684B450BAB437CAE46D6B9471534191AE6F0AB639A7491CC111D