Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 07:59:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 34EF63D1FE8C1915DDA728D72331983AD27C38405ACE04077D2A34D17471728E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. The suggested note above provides an opinion on government spending, but there was no inaccuracy in the tweet that needed to be corrected. Debate about allocating funds can be had in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655881842753413121
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 34EF63D1FE8C1915DDA728D72331983AD27C38405ACE04077D2A34D17471728E
  • createdAtMillis - 1683705585675
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165588184275341312134EF63D1FE8C1915DDA728D72331983AD27C38405ACE04077D2A34D17471728E