Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 18:56:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 830E5E97A25838015D64B6679AF4FF9248C06A25024AD15E6C0C7E02D874AEEB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is factually correct. Note suggesting that it is misleading is missing the point. If you wish to debate the risk VS your personal risk tolerance do so in the replys. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655786348073172992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 830E5E97A25838015D64B6679AF4FF9248C06A25024AD15E6C0C7E02D874AEEB
  • createdAtMillis - 1683658611659
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655786348073172992830E5E97A25838015D64B6679AF4FF9248C06A25024AD15E6C0C7E02D874AEEB