Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-09 19:05:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2B8E6E7F6A5AD2F1EBC8DA98BBA8C41302BB3CF19048CA884C443C8FA4ABFDF5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is factually correct. Note suggesting that it is misleading is missing the point. If you wish to debate the risk VS your personal risk tolerance do so in the replys. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655786348073172992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2B8E6E7F6A5AD2F1EBC8DA98BBA8C41302BB3CF19048CA884C443C8FA4ABFDF5
  • createdAtMillis - 1728500744447
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16557863480731729922B8E6E7F6A5AD2F1EBC8DA98BBA8C41302BB3CF19048CA884C443C8FA4ABFDF5