Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-27 10:32:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 66C3944F1045E6FD0B393DC83DF08F5D5CFF2B8F0D083F46E77F5AA23D5D5B82
Participant Details

Original Note:

POTENCIALMENTE ENGANOSO E SE BENEFICIA MAIS COM O CONTEXTO. O defensor do PL 2630 que trata da liberdade de expressão e opinião na Internet não sabe distinguir fato de opinião. Juridicamente, "fake news" é fato(!) sabidamente inverídico. Como é uma opinião, não há "fake news". https://www.redebrasilatual.com.br/politica/veja-perde-justica-materia-mentirosa/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1651076507786264576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 66C3944F1045E6FD0B393DC83DF08F5D5CFF2B8F0D083F46E77F5AA23D5D5B82
  • createdAtMillis - 1682591552442
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165107650778626457666C3944F1045E6FD0B393DC83DF08F5D5CFF2B8F0D083F46E77F5AA23D5D5B82