Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-20 12:56:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 616160B6E854B81EB11DEF9FAB6E6A6FB1640DBF7F5196235EF299F31683BCA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

1.情報元にした会社が信用ならないという主張が出ている 2.別の検証をしたがデータがおかしかったという主張が出ている https://twitter.com/tsuj/status/1648933895247892480 元になったソース https://prtimes.jp/main/html/rd/p/000000335.000018628.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1648940115115536386
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 616160B6E854B81EB11DEF9FAB6E6A6FB1640DBF7F5196235EF299F31683BCA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1681995361137
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1648940115115536386616160B6E854B81EB11DEF9FAB6E6A6FB1640DBF7F5196235EF299F31683BCA3