Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-20 03:17:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E1EA4C6DF3A0F336E487FD25A95EAB8F7930C51AF5392D03D194F9B17963E584
Participant Details

Original Note:

The other note uses a site litterally named conservative review.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1648820217097887746
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E1EA4C6DF3A0F336E487FD25A95EAB8F7930C51AF5392D03D194F9B17963E584
  • createdAtMillis - 1681960622902
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1648820217097887746E1EA4C6DF3A0F336E487FD25A95EAB8F7930C51AF5392D03D194F9B17963E584