Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-17 15:09:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 29E92ACED82F65E9BA2E53E74868A631A16C77A794A2413AFF36AF2E112404A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

El tuit es engañoso, ya que va acompañado de una imagen que es una recreación artística y no se corresponde en absoluto con la imagen real obtenida, disponible en este enlace: https://www.nationalgeographic.com.es/ciencia/inteligencia-artificial-ha-permitido-mejorar-primera-imagen-agujero-negro_19775

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1647864873710149634
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 29E92ACED82F65E9BA2E53E74868A631A16C77A794A2413AFF36AF2E112404A3
  • createdAtMillis - 1681744149714
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164786487371014963429E92ACED82F65E9BA2E53E74868A631A16C77A794A2413AFF36AF2E112404A3