Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 01:27:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47668F8F81BD582A5F9DC7CFECAD091E840F80BE3C51E1361722B67D85F22156
Participant Details

Original Note:

The way the tweet was written can make it seem as if the judge donated much more than he did, however the tweet is factual as the judge did donate money, allegedly.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644141748262776833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 47668F8F81BD582A5F9DC7CFECAD091E840F80BE3C51E1361722B67D85F22156
  • createdAtMillis - 1680830868444
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164414174826277683347668F8F81BD582A5F9DC7CFECAD091E840F80BE3C51E1361722B67D85F22156