Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-06 20:02:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D554BDB2A4397C56167ADF0E5D76409B2EDC0EE0D45C142E6AD8D729AE817A0C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrary to the suggested note, tweet does not claim bill specifically uses the words 'genital inspections'. Further, given Section 2(c)(1) of the bill, it's not unreasonable to claim this will lead to such inspections, beyond the usual "physical examination." Note unnecessary. http://kslegislature.org/li/b2023_24/measures/documents/hb2238_enrolled.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644006637680640000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D554BDB2A4397C56167ADF0E5D76409B2EDC0EE0D45C142E6AD8D729AE817A0C
  • createdAtMillis - 1680811350945
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1644006637680640000D554BDB2A4397C56167ADF0E5D76409B2EDC0EE0D45C142E6AD8D729AE817A0C