Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-03 15:11:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 28982C923AC397D6E9C13E7FE3A3A8B7BB4C37EAAF1A8BBD10F0D37245A8CA23
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. The tweet is part fact (as note above even admits) and part clear opinion. Whether the metric she uses is relevant is a debate for the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1642785483519303682
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 28982C923AC397D6E9C13E7FE3A3A8B7BB4C37EAAF1A8BBD10F0D37245A8CA23
  • createdAtMillis - 1680534714066
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164278548351930368228982C923AC397D6E9C13E7FE3A3A8B7BB4C37EAAF1A8BBD10F0D37245A8CA23