Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-03 12:39:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7CB4863585677E0639937D812D9B9BA450C83C27DE39967E8CADA114731D514
Participant Details

Original Note:

担当者は過去に小笠原で働いていたこともあり、「島流し」と断言する証拠はない。もし違っていた場合、名誉毀損になる。 https://www.jigyodan.org/hachioji/wp-content/uploads/4ccfc312ffe54f6bb9cd6b2b1b8f690b-1.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1642781417175412736
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7CB4863585677E0639937D812D9B9BA450C83C27DE39967E8CADA114731D514
  • createdAtMillis - 1680525556993
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1642781417175412736E7CB4863585677E0639937D812D9B9BA450C83C27DE39967E8CADA114731D514