Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-02 05:52:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F500E63FF22DD3A224D03A450FBE7818DB702DDE7291A3767CF3892E4B52A934
Participant Details

Original Note:

A decisão foi proferida pela Suprema Corte do Canadá em nov/2022 e envolvia o caso de uma investigação policial que atraiu criminosos sexuais através de anúncios falsos pela internet. A questão central era se esse tipo de investigação se qualificaria como uma armadilha. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/child-sex-offenders-online-ads-top-court-1.6662930

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1642326600065662977
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F500E63FF22DD3A224D03A450FBE7818DB702DDE7291A3767CF3892E4B52A934
  • createdAtMillis - 1680414776237
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1642326600065662977F500E63FF22DD3A224D03A450FBE7818DB702DDE7291A3767CF3892E4B52A934