Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-01 19:39:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C0E8783BA05E2549BDEAC83442A6209BD95777CF692E78AF4ABE58838CA687C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet being replied to refers to why one would not name their abuser with photo of Heard implying she named Depp as her abuser resulting in her being sued. The other tweeter is correct in stating that Heard never named Depp in her op-Ed prior to the defamation case proceedings https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/01/arts/depp-heard-trial.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1642111487190659079
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2C0E8783BA05E2549BDEAC83442A6209BD95777CF692E78AF4ABE58838CA687C
  • createdAtMillis - 1680377975305
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16421114871906590792C0E8783BA05E2549BDEAC83442A6209BD95777CF692E78AF4ABE58838CA687C