Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-25 11:54:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 62F6C874A67E9F99BFC589752C34EEE70EC2D8A61F9B28802F6A40DE12E5908C
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://twitter.com/kijibato_hato/status/1636620580534493184 上記リプライにもあるように、これはあくまで破壊調査があったことからその橋に不正な建築の疑いがかけられていることを心配するものであり、破壊調査による橋の強度の低下などを訴えるものではない。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1639269748419575808
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 62F6C874A67E9F99BFC589752C34EEE70EC2D8A61F9B28802F6A40DE12E5908C
  • createdAtMillis - 1679745242265
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163926974841957580862F6C874A67E9F99BFC589752C34EEE70EC2D8A61F9B28802F6A40DE12E5908C