Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-25 15:15:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B327FAE81B011E1ECBF20725E20B98C2353E44CF95E04CBC6D6CD1ACC156FBA
Participant Details

Original Note:

False. Being a woman was never classified as a pre-existing condition nor was it solely the reason to deny a person insurance coverage but there were some pre-existing conditions that only affected women. Denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions is illegal by ACA. https://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/about-the-aca/pre-existing-conditions/index.html https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/pre-existing-condition-prevalence-among-women-under-age-65/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1639231884545671168
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5B327FAE81B011E1ECBF20725E20B98C2353E44CF95E04CBC6D6CD1ACC156FBA
  • createdAtMillis - 1679757335049
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16392318845456711685B327FAE81B011E1ECBF20725E20B98C2353E44CF95E04CBC6D6CD1ACC156FBA