Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-17 07:03:42 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B2C52D18B89F349952FD68330916863586E407E53F7B438FC44ABE7DEC16B912
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is untrue as can be proven: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2015954117 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abg6296 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014564118

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636311979823382535
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B2C52D18B89F349952FD68330916863586E407E53F7B438FC44ABE7DEC16B912
  • createdAtMillis - 1679036622979
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1636311979823382535B2C52D18B89F349952FD68330916863586E407E53F7B438FC44ABE7DEC16B912