Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-15 16:17:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ABA03041C2069C3ED91AD2F6675946CBEEB471B21A0BAFC2E8D9D9223A0F8DDB
Participant Details

Original Note:

On the points in the suggested note: 1. Reasons for are irrelevant, claim in tweet is correct. 2 & 3. Irrelevant. 4 & 5. Doesn't say where it didn't happen. 6. There is no obligation for tweets to always provide sources. Debates should be in the replies, not in notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635962350573322244
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ABA03041C2069C3ED91AD2F6675946CBEEB471B21A0BAFC2E8D9D9223A0F8DDB
  • createdAtMillis - 1678897048621
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1635962350573322244ABA03041C2069C3ED91AD2F6675946CBEEB471B21A0BAFC2E8D9D9223A0F8DDB