Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-12 16:47:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4DF1CDFBEA3F6DE525FEEC58EEAF593D6DE2475010A316ED6876FA4CA230339A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is interpreting the attached video—an opinion. As the tweet includes the unedited video of the alleged evidence, the user provides sufficient context for users to come to their own conclusion. The onus of interpreting the implications of the evidence rests on the user.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633697210352140289
  • participantId - 4DF1CDFBEA3F6DE525FEEC58EEAF593D6DE2475010A316ED6876FA4CA230339A
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678639648720
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16336972103521402894DF1CDFBEA3F6DE525FEEC58EEAF593D6DE2475010A316ED6876FA4CA230339A