Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-21 16:14:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D5AE82C1F013A5CB9BB0A4FF104AB209D84F16E65110055D3AD5E47271FD42CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

If a user believes a tweet is violating twitter rules (in this case by attempting to generate likes via a false tweet), then they should report the tweet rather than adding a note. Notes should be to clarify or contextualize, not to discipline or report. https://twitter.github.io/communitynotes/values/ https://twitter.github.io/communitynotes/faq/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1628056206077050880
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D5AE82C1F013A5CB9BB0A4FF104AB209D84F16E65110055D3AD5E47271FD42CA
createdAtMillis - 1676996042677
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1628056206077050880D5AE82C1F013A5CB9BB0A4FF104AB209D84F16E65110055D3AD5E47271FD42CA