Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-17 19:08:41 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A2A98041131F8FE4971AFC019B46865264C503482852E458D6ECD8324E162932
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details