Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-14 10:50:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A04C0B1B084FA410F992DE1C309FB9E9BAB2F595FA5F4A912DDF1D4E350C2FB4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note is needed. It’s not critiquing the political claim of the tweet but correcting an important geographic distinction regardless a high profile event. Given the geographic importance of the waterways in this situation, it’s appropriate to correct the city-naming mistake

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1625372637907103745
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A04C0B1B084FA410F992DE1C309FB9E9BAB2F595FA5F4A912DDF1D4E350C2FB4
  • createdAtMillis - 1676371816736
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1625372637907103745A04C0B1B084FA410F992DE1C309FB9E9BAB2F595FA5F4A912DDF1D4E350C2FB4