Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-14 02:11:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C43CCBDFED943691DB059417AB475B5B2B82E053794AD78CE1BA9E2BCF1A705
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet makes limited factual claims, which are correct. It's primarily a statement of opinion, which does not warrant a note. This note also misrepresents the "risk" to anyone, the notice to journalists, and the basis for the challenged bans.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1625272077459521541
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C43CCBDFED943691DB059417AB475B5B2B82E053794AD78CE1BA9E2BCF1A705
  • createdAtMillis - 1676340694036
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16252720774595215410C43CCBDFED943691DB059417AB475B5B2B82E053794AD78CE1BA9E2BCF1A705