Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-06 15:40:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7F31958ABBD1E32DCC0A2F4AC7A672FD66EF97D6990950CB58F2F6EB459DFBBB
Participant Details

Original Note:

In ISOLATION, this tweet doesn’t need a note but because it’s now being shared by some passing blame and suggesting that someone SHOULD have done something because they were warned, it must be noted that there is no scientifically accepted (or reliable) way to predict quakes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1622502895022399488
  • participantId - 7F31958ABBD1E32DCC0A2F4AC7A672FD66EF97D6990950CB58F2F6EB459DFBBB
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675698038694
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16225028950223994887F31958ABBD1E32DCC0A2F4AC7A672FD66EF97D6990950CB58F2F6EB459DFBBB