Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-07 00:02:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5EDC2B8BBEA2C25FBA40E8849AF6DD751A4AE52F674E4E2311C09F82909AD4F8
Participant Details

Original Note:

In ISOLATION, this tweet doesn’t need a note but because it’s now being shared by some passing blame and suggesting that someone SHOULD have done something because they were warned, it must be noted that there is no scientifically accepted (or reliable) way to predict quakes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1622502895022399488
  • participantId - 5EDC2B8BBEA2C25FBA40E8849AF6DD751A4AE52F674E4E2311C09F82909AD4F8
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675728178416
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16225028950223994885EDC2B8BBEA2C25FBA40E8849AF6DD751A4AE52F674E4E2311C09F82909AD4F8