Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-01 10:20:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48DC82B59D8E6EBF6C25C01BC04C82697822029AA41AE3351CB526DDD64611F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

First sentence under Authors' Conclusions "The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions." ... https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1620654651048882178
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 48DC82B59D8E6EBF6C25C01BC04C82697822029AA41AE3351CB526DDD64611F3
createdAtMillis - 1675246821693
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 162065465104888217848DC82B59D8E6EBF6C25C01BC04C82697822029AA41AE3351CB526DDD64611F3