Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-31 11:46:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3440E327FFC09396E77E3C806B2CE63500A27905ABDA4DA599C2EFB3935307B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The previous Note's source (one being firewalled) actually supports the tweets narrative. Regardless of the reasoning behind the "censorship", the tweet is correct. No Note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620373977242771457
  • participantId - 3440E327FFC09396E77E3C806B2CE63500A27905ABDA4DA599C2EFB3935307B4
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675165562355
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16203739772427714573440E327FFC09396E77E3C806B2CE63500A27905ABDA4DA599C2EFB3935307B4