Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-23 03:12:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 164B6163F0A6EB02FF236BDBFFB87BDDC73C53F02D088E25FD97E44010F14CB0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Rasmussen Reports has a mixed historical accuracy. Some have reported favourably about their performance in the 2004 and 2006 general elections. There was later criticism about bias towards Republicans both in the polling results and questions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports#Evaluations_of_accuracy_and_performance

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1617179848463499266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 164B6163F0A6EB02FF236BDBFFB87BDDC73C53F02D088E25FD97E44010F14CB0
  • createdAtMillis - 1674443543112
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1617179848463499266164B6163F0A6EB02FF236BDBFFB87BDDC73C53F02D088E25FD97E44010F14CB0