Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-22 21:19:53 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75FC828DF26762CCEE486208072BEF2F653DF99F9FAAB4E181B5FBCA5182CB47
Participant Details

Original Note:

tweet is factually incorrect. The Op-Ed was ruled defamatory. jurors ruled that Heard defamed Depp with actual Malice. The judgment is entered into record & stands as the appeals have been withdrawn, due to a confidential agreement between parties. https://news.sky.com/story/amber-heard-files-appeal-against-johnny-depp-libel-trial-verdict-12762074 More info on court website

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1617161577555271682
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 75FC828DF26762CCEE486208072BEF2F653DF99F9FAAB4E181B5FBCA5182CB47
  • createdAtMillis - 1674422393026
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 161716157755527168275FC828DF26762CCEE486208072BEF2F653DF99F9FAAB4E181B5FBCA5182CB47