Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-21 23:31:53 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 33EC0E8AE464AF97464945E210D61C07B9066E1CCD8F632E8D395F749ED89FA0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet expresses a personal opinion based on the law and circumstances. The author further explains in the article why they don’t think this case reaches the legal definition of involuntary manslaughter.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1616842446880804865
  • participantId - 33EC0E8AE464AF97464945E210D61C07B9066E1CCD8F632E8D395F749ED89FA0
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1674343913047
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 161684244688080486533EC0E8AE464AF97464945E210D61C07B9066E1CCD8F632E8D395F749ED89FA0