Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-18 19:32:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 553EEE07DD808F0118BB54CF1A3BAC46E4B381176F93408541E689592A1B23A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The video linked begins with Hancock saying his series was "thoroughly researched" yet it shows evidence to the contrary. Each episode used non-experts for opinions and omitted data. He said no good radiocarbon dates for temples; there are if he researched "thoroughly." https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/315524

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1610321871727366144
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 553EEE07DD808F0118BB54CF1A3BAC46E4B381176F93408541E689592A1B23A3
createdAtMillis - 1674070331261
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1610321871727366144553EEE07DD808F0118BB54CF1A3BAC46E4B381176F93408541E689592A1B23A3