Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-21 20:37:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 530EE3092E1EAF992A52AEBB1A166852BF7D808F236E979499CFA65E0398BAC6
Participant Details

Original Note:

OPINION This is clearly an opinion. It doesn’t need massaging by a reviewing community. Even the two notes here were actually arguing here - both belonged in the comment section IMHO. If anything, notes should improve the information and not just become prioritized comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1605519274990247938
  • participantId - 530EE3092E1EAF992A52AEBB1A166852BF7D808F236E979499CFA65E0398BAC6
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1671655069312
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1605519274990247938530EE3092E1EAF992A52AEBB1A166852BF7D808F236E979499CFA65E0398BAC6