Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-17 17:28:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1E7D716B6979AD308362B425921F47985F8759D11C2B725E186DDA049C52DE9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The inroduction, "Do I think," designates personal opinion, as does the conclusion that interference is "wrong" - a moral judgement. It could be more clear that "election interference by social media companies" is a personal assessment, not a universal view of the situation. https://www.justice.gov/crt/title-52-voting-and-elections-subtitle-i-and-ii#:~:text=No%20person%2C%20whether%20acting%20under,vote%20for%2C%20or%20not%20to

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601675528142225409
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1E7D716B6979AD308362B425921F47985F8759D11C2B725E186DDA049C52DE9
  • createdAtMillis - 1671298128470
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1601675528142225409C1E7D716B6979AD308362B425921F47985F8759D11C2B725E186DDA049C52DE9