Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-03 16:45:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 55A94E6B073FD2DD09006D636CF5415C962E8001EF4AE9147E381C3DEA87BAE0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The number sounds impressive, but there is no context to historical data. Additionally, an "impression" is an incomplete idea as it claims to count how many times a tweet was seen, but actually only tracks how many times it was "visible" as a user was scrolling or searching.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1598863777977475073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 55A94E6B073FD2DD09006D636CF5415C962E8001EF4AE9147E381C3DEA87BAE0
  • createdAtMillis - 1670085913998
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 159886377797747507355A94E6B073FD2DD09006D636CF5415C962E8001EF4AE9147E381C3DEA87BAE0