Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-20 21:11:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 94FD8B8E5B9ADF4A960DAD3DAE1D46EAE845C36FCCBABE50CE43CFDB734E8716
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article in question presents zero evidence to the facts outlined. What is presented is a singular testimony of a partisan contact. The NYT even states they could not subsequently find corroborating evidence to support the singular testimony.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594337310874689538
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 94FD8B8E5B9ADF4A960DAD3DAE1D46EAE845C36FCCBABE50CE43CFDB734E8716
  • createdAtMillis - 1668978692871
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 159433731087468953894FD8B8E5B9ADF4A960DAD3DAE1D46EAE845C36FCCBABE50CE43CFDB734E8716