Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-19 23:21:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5AE53E8CE1CAFC7E119FF2D44DFDE8D914C04E6E2EB5F68C5BB9B4326F671BF6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Interesting Twitter poll, context absent, have the terms of service changed since the violation? If not, why would you even consider it? No lawsuits against the suspension have succeeded, seems it shouldn't be decided by the users, let the TOS prevail.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594064583840464898
  • participantId - 5AE53E8CE1CAFC7E119FF2D44DFDE8D914C04E6E2EB5F68C5BB9B4326F671BF6
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1668900080071
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 15940645838404648985AE53E8CE1CAFC7E119FF2D44DFDE8D914C04E6E2EB5F68C5BB9B4326F671BF6