Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-08-22 09:15:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 134A0B1EFCD42F1E311A0F1E5E9BA87302BE323C850FE973D7499B886238C2D3
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. The subpoena in question didn't cover those documents.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1561399285811494921
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 134A0B1EFCD42F1E311A0F1E5E9BA87302BE323C850FE973D7499B886238C2D3
  • createdAtMillis - 1661159701348
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1561399285811494921134A0B1EFCD42F1E311A0F1E5E9BA87302BE323C850FE973D7499B886238C2D3